14 April 2006

Let's try to put the horse in front of the Belfast cart

Irish Examiner

14/04/06

THE Northern political parties have been given until November to resolve their differences in the implementation of the Good Friday Agreement.

It would appear that the prospects for success are being deliberately downplayed so as not to raise public hopes too high and thereby place inordinate pressure on the participants.

The DUP are making the issue of republican criminality a sticking point. They see this as the main obstacle in the way of government in the North. Irrespective of the validity of their concerns, others will see their stance as somewhat akin to cutting off the nose to spite the face.

Why hand terrorists and criminals the veto on progress? But also, it could perhaps be discerned from comments made by Martin McGuinness at the recent Sinn Féin árd fheis that his party too is equally prepared to take a hard-nosed approach: “... even if it (the Good Friday Agreement) falls we are confident that ... its substance has been secured as the minimal threshold for anything that might replace or supersede it.”

So the question is, does the agreement remain a viable framework for a peace settlement or is it in need of serious overhaul? I would suggest that the failure of the agreement to date to provide for democratic institutions in the North, as set out in Strand 1 of the agreement, represents not so much the failure of politics. Rather this failure is the outcome of the type of politics which Strand 1 seeks to impose.

There is in fact an inherent flaw in the agreement, though it could be argued that this was necessary to ensure some form of deal in 1998. At the time of its negotiation the key challenge was to hasten an end to armed conflict, civil and sectarian strife.

The agreement has made considerable progress in this direction. The failure has been in the area of establishing democratic government in the North. My view is that as long as those measures set out in the agreement which basically seek to institutionalise division (nationalist v unionist) act as the prerequisite for consensus, stalemate will be inevitable.

This may or may not be what the two governments have in mind in their recent joint statement where they mention that “consideration could be given to proposals for the implementation of the agreement, including changes to Strands 1 to 3 in the context of a commitment by all involved to participate in a power-sharing executive”.

Is it only in Ireland that the cart is continually put before the horse? Instead of political divisions and party allegiances emerging organically out of political life, these become a precondition for political life itself. Similarly, instead of democratic politics being the mechanism to resolve fundamental differences, the emphasis is placed on resolving fundamental differences before democratic politics can be instituted.

I would suggest a few simple amendments to the agreement which could enable formation of a government in the North while also safeguarding commitments to cross-community co-operation. Firstly, the notion of Assembly members registering a designation of identity (nationalist, unionist or other) should be scrapped. Obviously political allegiances would continue to play a role, but they would have no formal sanction.

Secondly, the appointment of First Minister, Deputy First Minister and other official positions should be by the direct election of the Assembly as a whole. This could be by simple majority, or weighted majority if such a safeguard was deemed necessary, but again without regard to political designation. This would enable members to take office solely on the basis of their mandates and not on the basis of having ‘sold out’ or having ‘done a deal with the enemy’.

Parties and political allegiances are historical transients by nature. We should remember the advice of US president and constitution-maker James Madison, given almost 220 years ago: “In framing a system which we wish to last for ages, we should not lose sight of the changes which ages will produce.”

Oscar Ó Dúgáin
Ascaill Dhroichead Chairdhuibh
Fionnghlaise
Baile Átha Cliath 11.

Comments: Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?